Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cost of a car purchased only for removing and using its spare parts in another vehicle was allowable as revenue expenditure instead of being treated as a depreciation claim on a capital asset.
Analysis: The assessee established that the vehicle was acquired only for its usable parts, that the parts were removed for use in the existing car, and that the registration and fitness certificate of the purchased vehicle were cancelled. On those facts, the vehicle, after dismantling, was found to have no continuing value in the business. The expenditure was therefore not regarded as the acquisition of a capital asset yielding an enduring advantage, but as the cost of parts consumed in the business.
Conclusion: The full purchase price was held allowable as revenue expenditure and the assessee succeeded on the issue.