TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal emphasizes assessing deductibility and reasonableness of commission payments to related parties</h1> <h3>INCOME TAX OFFICER. Versus SWAMY INDUSTRIES.</h3> INCOME TAX OFFICER. Versus SWAMY INDUSTRIES. - TTJ 012, 370, Issues involved: Allowability of commission paid to two persons as a deduction under s. 37 and consideration of provisions of s. 40A (2) regarding the excessiveness or unreasonableness of the payments.Analysis:The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin involved a departmental appeal concerning the deductibility of commission paid to two individuals by a firm engaged in manufacturing tins used in cashew and sea-food factories. The key contention revolved around whether the commission payments were legitimate business expenditures under s. 37. The firm had paid Rs. 24,000 to one individual and Rs. 13,500 to another, both being nephews of a partner, without any written contract. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) questioned the services rendered by these individuals, as there was already a manager overseeing the business operations. The ITO disallowed the commission payments, invoking the provisions of s. 40A (2) and stating that in a seller's market, commission payments were unnecessary.The Appellate Commissioner (AAC), however, allowed the claim, emphasizing the increased profits attributable to the services of the two individuals and highlighting that the presence of a manager did not negate the contributions made by the commission agents. The Tribunal noted that the burden of proving the payments as legitimate business expenses rested on the assessee, who had not been directly called upon to provide further evidence. The Tribunal disagreed with the ITO's assertion that commission payments were unwarranted in a seller's market, citing that commissions are common even in such scenarios. The AAC's failure to consider the application of s. 40A (2) regarding the reasonableness of the payments, especially due to the close relation of the individuals to the partners, led the Tribunal to set aside that part of the order and direct the ITO to assess the issue under s. 40A(2) to determine the fairness of the payments in relation to the market value of services rendered.In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, highlighting the importance of assessing both the deductibility under s. 37 and the reasonableness under s. 40A (2) when considering commission payments to related parties in a business context.
TaxTMI 