Life insurance premia paid from family income were not a taxable gift; the remaining deposit qualified for exemption.

Payment of life insurance premia from a spouse's income was treated as part of family maintenance and discharge of a personal obligation, not a gratuitous transfer, so it did not amount to a taxable gift in favour of the husband. The analysis relied on the statutory duty of maintenance under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, and the character of the policies as benefiting the wife and children under the Married Women's Property Act, 1874. After excluding that amount, the remaining fixed deposit gift of Rs. 50,000 fell within the claimed exemption under section 5(1)(viii) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, leaving no taxable gift.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether payment of life insurance premia on policies taken by the husband, out of the assessee's funds, constituted a taxable gift in favour of the husband. (ii) Whether, on the facts, the exemption under section 5(1)(viii) remained available so that the fixed deposit gift of Rs. 50,000 was not taxable.

Issue (i): Whether payment of life insurance premia on policies taken by the husband, out of the assessee's funds, constituted a taxable gift in favour of the husband.

Analysis: The payments were treated as part of the family's pooled resources used for household maintenance and for meeting obligations connected with the upkeep of the family. The assessee, as the major income earner, was held to be discharging her own maintenance obligation, including provision for the future of her children. Support was drawn from the statutory duty of maintenance under sections 20 and 23 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, and from the character of the insurance policies as being for the benefit of the wife and children under section 6(1) of the Married Women's Property Act, 1874.

Conclusion: The premium payments did not constitute a gift.

Issue (ii): Whether, on the facts, the exemption under section 5(1)(viii) remained available so that the fixed deposit gift of Rs. 50,000 was not taxable.

Analysis: Once the insurance premium payments were excluded from the computation as non-gifts, the remaining transfer was only the fixed deposit of Rs. 50,000. That amount fell within the claimed exemption under section 5(1)(viii) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958.

Conclusion: The fixed deposit gift was exempt and no taxable gift survived.

Final Conclusion: The assessee had no taxable gift and the appeal succeeded in full.

Ratio Decidendi: A payment made by a spouse from her own income towards life insurance premia and family maintenance is not a gift where it represents discharge of a personal and family obligation rather than a transfer made gratuitously in favour of the other spouse.

---