TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeals allowed for penalty under section 271(1)(a) due to workload, no extension sought.</h1> <h3>PK. Transports. Versus Income Tax Officer.</h3> The appeals were allowed against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(a) for the assessment years 1967-68 and 1968-69 for a firm. The court found that ... - The appeals were against the penalty under s. 271(1)(a) for the asst. yrs. 1967-68 and 1968-69 for a firm. The delay in filing returns was due to heavy work and auditing volume, not conscious disregard. No evidence of application for extension of time. Appeals allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
