Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for income from Kuri/Chitti business in the assessment years 1984-85 and 1985-86, or whether section 11(4A) denied the exemption because the business was not mainly carried on by the beneficiaries of the institution.
Analysis: The business had been carried on by the assessee since inception and was treated as property held under trust. The Court held that section 11(4A)(b) had to be read in the context of the earlier pari materia language in section 4(3)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1922. The expression that the work in connection with the business is mainly carried on by the beneficiaries of the institution was construed to mean that the business must be managed and controlled in substance for the benefit of the institution, and not that every beneficiary must personally conduct the business. The Court further held that the Revenue had not disputed the charitable character of the assessee, the application of income for charitable purposes, or the maintenance of separate books of account.
Conclusion: Section 11(4A) did not disqualify the assessee, and the assessee remained entitled to exemption under section 11.