Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether creation of a reserve fund under section 17 of the Banking Companies Act, 1949 satisfied the requirement of creating a separate reserve account under proviso (b) to section 10(2)(vib) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 for claiming development rebate.
Analysis: The allowance of development rebate was a statutory concession subject to strict fulfilment of the conditions in proviso (b) to section 10(2)(vib). That proviso required a debit to the profit and loss account and a credit to a reserve account to be utilised for the business during the stipulated period. The reserve mandated by the Banking Companies Act, 1949 served a different purpose, was a separate reserve, and could not be treated as the independent reserve contemplated by the Income-tax Act. The statutory entries were not a mere formality, and the reserve had to be created at the time of making up the profit and loss account.
Conclusion: The reserve created under section 17 of the Banking Companies Act, 1949 did not amount to compliance with proviso (b) to section 10(2)(vib) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and the assessee was not entitled to the development rebate.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tax concession is made conditional upon creation of a specific statutory reserve, compliance must be exact and a reserve created for a different statutory purpose cannot substitute for the reserve required by the taxing provision.