Court rules trust deed payments not annuities under Wealth-tax Act, included in net wealth. Jewellery exempted.

The court ruled that the payments to the assessee under trust deeds did not qualify as annuities under the Wealth-tax Act, as they were shares of income, not fixed sums. Consequently, these payments were included in the assessee's net wealth. However, the court exempted the value of jewellery owned by the assessee from wealth tax under section 5(1)(viii) as it was intended for personal use. The appeals were dismissed, with no costs awarded.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the payments to the assessee under the three trust deeds qualify as annuities under section 2(e)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
2. Whether the value of the jewellery owned by the assessee is exempt under section 5(1)(viii) in computing the net wealth of the assessee.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Whether the payments to the assessee under the three trust deeds qualify as annuities under section 2(e)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957:

The court examined whether the payments to the assessee under the trust deeds could be considered as annuities, which would preclude their inclusion in the computation of her net wealth under section 2(e)(iv). The trust deeds executed by the father and the mother-in-law of the assessee provided her with a share of the income arising from the trust funds, but not a fixed sum of money. The definition of "annuity" as provided in various legal texts, including Halsbury's Laws of England and Jarman on Wills, indicates that an annuity is a fixed sum of money payable yearly. The court concluded that the payments to the assessee did not qualify as annuities because they were not fixed sums but rather shares of the income from the trust funds. Consequently, these payments could not be excluded from her net wealth under section 2(e)(iv).

2. Whether the value of the jewellery owned by the assessee is exempt under section 5(1)(viii) in computing the net wealth of the assessee:

The court then addressed whether the jewellery owned by the assessee, valued at Rs. 80,000, should be exempt from her net wealth under section 5(1)(viii). The Wealth-tax Officer had deducted Rs. 25,000 under section 5(1)(xv) but included the remaining value in her net wealth. The court noted that section 5(1)(viii) exempts "furniture, household utensils, wearing apparel, provisions and other articles intended for the personal or household use of the assessee." The court agreed with the Tribunal and the High Court that the jewellery in question was intended for the personal use of the assessee. It held that jewellery intended for personal use falls under section 5(1)(viii) and is exempt from wealth tax. The court distinguished this from section 5(1)(xv), which deals with jewellery in general and allows a deduction of Rs. 25,000 regardless of personal use. Thus, the court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the exemption of her jewellery under section 5(1)(viii).

Conclusion:

The appeals were dismissed, with the court affirming that the payments under the trust deeds were not annuities and thus includable in the net wealth of the assessee. However, the jewellery intended for personal use was exempt under section 5(1)(viii). Appeals dismissed, no costs.

---