Reopening for escaped income and deposit interest treatment confirmed: section 148 notice valid, and export deduction denied on interest income.

A return processed under section 143(1)(a) does not amount to a completed assessment, and the absence of a timely notice under section 143(2) did not prevent reopening where income had escaped assessment. Excess relief allowed under section 80HHC was treated as escapement under the statutory explanation to section 147, so the notice under section 148 and the assessment made pursuant to it were valid. Interest earned on fixed deposits and cash certificates was held to arise from the deposits themselves, not directly from export activity, and was therefore assessable as income from other sources and excluded from deduction under section 80HHC. The assessment was upheld in full.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the notice issued under section 148 and the assessment made thereunder were valid; (ii) Whether interest earned on fixed deposits and cash certificates was assessable as income from other sources and excluded from deduction under section 80HHC.

Issue (i): Whether the notice issued under section 148 and the assessment made thereunder were valid.

Analysis: The intimation under section 143(1)(a) is not an assessment order in the general sense and cannot be treated as a completed assessment for the purpose of reopening. The absence of a notice under section 143(2) within time prevented a regular assessment under section 143(3), but that did not bar action under section 147 where the Assessing Officer had reason to believe that income had escaped assessment. Excess relief allowed under section 80HHC is deemed escapement under the statutory explanation to section 147. The earlier rectification proceedings under section 154 were separate and their cancellation did not destroy the jurisdiction to proceed under section 148.

Conclusion: The notice under section 148 and the assessment made pursuant to it were valid, and this issue was decided against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether interest earned on fixed deposits and cash certificates was assessable as income from other sources and excluded from deduction under section 80HHC.

Analysis: The immediate source of the interest was the deposits themselves, not the export business. The funds were placed in long-term deposits and the interest lacked a direct nexus with the export activity. Deduction under section 80HHC is confined to profit derived from export, and income that is only indirectly connected with business does not satisfy that test. The reasoning applied the settled principle that the expression "derived from" requires the immediate and effective source of the profit, and interest on bank deposits is ordinarily taxable under the head income from other sources.

Conclusion: The interest income was correctly assessed under the head income from other sources and was not eligible for deduction under section 80HHC; this issue was decided against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The assessment was upheld in full and the appeal failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Excess relief allowed on a return processed under section 143(1)(a), where income has escaped assessment, can found jurisdiction under section 147 and notice under section 148; interest earned on bank deposits is not profit derived from export activity unless there is a direct and immediate nexus with that activity.

---