Packing and delivery costs for jewellery were treated as distribution expenditure, not advertisement or sales promotion, under tax law.

Expenditure on fancy boxes used to pack and hand over jewellery after sale was treated as distribution expenditure incurred to protect the articles and enable delivery to the customer. It was not regarded as advertisement, publicity or sales promotion, and therefore did not fall within the specified categories covered by section 37(3A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The cost of the fancy boxes was accordingly held outside the disallowance computation, and the addition made on that basis was unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the cost of fancy boxes used for delivering jewellery to customers was liable to be included in the disallowance computation under section 37(3A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The expenditure on fancy boxes was found to be incurred for packing and handing over jewellery after sale, to preserve and protect the articles and enable the customer to carry them home. It was treated as expenditure connected with distribution after the sale, and not as advertisement, publicity or sales promotion. Since section 37(3A) applies only to the specified categories of expenditure, the cost of fancy boxes did not fall within its scope.

Conclusion: The inclusion of the cost of fancy boxes under section 37(3A) was held to be unsustainable and was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The enhancement made by the first appellate authority on account of fancy boxes was set aside, and the appeal succeeded to that extent.

Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure incurred for packing and delivering goods after sale, which is in the nature of distribution expenditure, does not amount to advertisement, publicity or sales promotion for the purposes of section 37(3A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

---