1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>ITAT Cochin: Fancy boxes are distribution, not advertisement expenses. Appeal partly allowed.</h1> The ITAT Cochin allowed the appeal in part, disagreeing with the CIT(A) by stating that fancy boxes are distribution expenses, not advertisement expenses. ... Advertisement, Publicity And Sales Promotion The ITAT Cochin judgment involved an appeal by a jewellery firm for the assessment year 1985-86. The Assessing Officer disallowed expenses under section 37(3A) totaling Rs. 18,732. The CIT(A) enhanced the disallowance by including the cost of fancy boxes as part of advertisement expenses. However, the ITAT Cochin disagreed, stating that fancy boxes are distribution expenses, not advertisement expenses. The appeal was allowed in part.