Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether agricultural land situated in an urban area and used for agricultural operations constitutes "business premises" so as to fall outside the charge of additional wealth-tax as an "urban asset" under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
Analysis: The exemption from additional wealth-tax applies only where the land is used throughout the previous year for the assessee's business or profession. The expression "business" in the relevant schedule is read in the sense of trade, commerce, manufacture or an adventure in the nature of trade, and the land must be used for an activity capable of yielding profits assessable as business income. Agricultural operations, even if systematic, produce agricultural income arising from the land and not profits and gains of business or profession. On that basis, agricultural use of urban land does not amount to use of the land as business premises for the purpose of the exemption.
Conclusion: Agricultural land used for cultivation does not qualify as "business premises" under the rate schedule and remains liable to additional wealth-tax as an urban asset. The claim for exemption fails.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of the additional wealth-tax exemption, land in an urban area is "business premises" only if it is used for an activity amounting to business or profession and capable of generating taxable business profits; agricultural operations do not satisfy that test.