Tribunal denies sugarcane price claim & interest deduction under section 80-I, cites HC precedent.

The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 2,53,23,741 representing additional sugarcane price by a co-operative society, citing unilateral enhancement of sugarcane price without actual payments to farmers. The Tribunal referenced a similar decision by Punjab & Haryana HC. Additionally, interest income from other co-operative societies was excluded from deduction under section 80-I, following precedents. The appeal was dismissed, affirming both disallowances.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of Rs. 2,53,23,741 representing additional sugarcane price.
2. Computation of deduction under section 80-I.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

Disallowance of Rs. 2,53,23,741 Representing Additional Sugarcane Price
The appellant, a co-operative society engaged in the manufacture of sugar, had increased the sugarcane price by Rs. 9 per quintal retrospectively, crediting the additional price to the share deduction account without making actual payments to the farmers. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction of Rs. 2,53,23,741 on several grounds, including the backdated entry, lack of liability on 31-3-1993, and the unilateral decision to credit the share deduction account instead of making payments to the farmers. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, stating that the enhancement of sugarcane price was unilateral and aimed at increasing the share capital without actual payment to the farmers.

The appellant contended that the liability accrued during the relevant year, supported by the bye-laws of the society and similar procedures followed in previous years. However, the Tribunal found that the enhancement of sugarcane price was not in accordance with the formula determined by the State Federation of Co-operative Mills and was a unilateral decision to enhance the capital base at the cost of the exchequer. The Tribunal emphasized that the additional price was credited to the share deduction account without informing the farmers or making actual payments, thereby supporting the revenue's contention that the deduction was not justified.

The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Shahabad Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd. v. CIT, where a similar issue was decided against the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 2,53,23,741, dismissing the ground of appeal.

Computation of Deduction Under Section 80-I
The appellant had received interest from other co-operative societies, which the Assessing Officer excluded from the computation of deduction under section 80-I. The Tribunal noted that this issue was covered against the assessee by the decision of the Chandigarh Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Punjab Tractors Ltd. v. Deputy CIT, and the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in CIT v. Sterling Foods and Pandian Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed this ground of appeal as well.

Conclusion
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee, upholding the disallowance of Rs. 2,53,23,741 representing additional sugarcane price and the exclusion of interest income from the computation of deduction under section 80-I.

---