Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rule 1BB applied to the valuation of the assessee's self-occupied house for the assessment years in question, and whether the wealth-tax authorities were bound to value the property in accordance with that rule instead of adopting the purchase price.
Analysis: The assessment years under appeal fell within the period when rule 1BB remained operative. The rule was treated as having binding effect on the valuation of self-occupied residential property, on the same footing as mandatory valuation rules recognised by the Supreme Court. Since the property was self-occupied, its value had to be determined under the prescribed rule rather than by substituting the purchase price as the market value.
Conclusion: Rule 1BB was held applicable to the assessee's self-occupied house for all the years under consideration, and the valuation adopted by the wealth-tax officer was set aside in favour of valuation under rule 1BB.