Father's income not to include interest on amounts for daughters' marriage/maintenance. Upholding legal principles and precedents.

The Tribunal dismissed the reference application, affirming that interest accrued on amounts set aside for marriage and maintenance of unmarried daughters should not be included in the father's income. This decision was based on established legal principles and previous rulings, including a Punjab and Haryana High Court decision, emphasizing the importance of adhering to binding precedents and avoiding unnecessary appeals to higher courts for settled matters.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether interest accrued on amounts set apart on partition as provision for marriage and maintenance of unmarried daughters could be included in the hands of the father, the assessee.

Analysis:
The CIT (Central), Ludhiana, sought a reference under s. 256(1) of the IT Act 1961 to the High Court regarding the inclusion of interest accrued on amounts set aside for marriage and maintenance of unmarried daughters in the father's income. The HUF made a provision for the marriage of a minor daughter during partial partition. The ITO initially rejected the contention that the accrued interest should not be added to the father's income. The CIT(A) later excluded the interest amount. The Tribunal, relying on a previous decision, upheld the CIT(A)'s finding, which was also supported by a Punjab and Haryana High Court decision in a similar case. The Tribunal rejected the reference request as the issue was already settled by the High Court decision.

The Tribunal highlighted a case where a similar reference request was rejected for consistency with the High Court decision. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following binding decisions and the futility of referring settled matters to the High Court. Citing previous judgments, the Tribunal explained that questioning the correctness of a binding decision was unwarranted. The Tribunal acknowledged the Revenue's desire to appeal to the Supreme Court but emphasized that settled matters did not require further reference. Despite the Revenue's argument for Supreme Court appeal, the Tribunal dismissed the reference application based on the existing legal precedents and reasoning provided in previous cases.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the reference application, maintaining that the issue of including interest accrued on amounts set aside for marriage and maintenance of unmarried daughters in the father's income was already settled by previous decisions, including a Punjab and Haryana High Court ruling. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following binding decisions and declined the reference request based on established legal principles and the lack of necessity for further review by the High Court or Supreme Court.

---