Tribunal revokes stay order for non-compliance, emphasizes fair dealings, allows full demand recovery

The Tribunal revoked the stay order granted to the assessee due to repeated violations of payment and security furnishing directions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of compliance with its orders, criticized attempts to influence payments, and stressed the need for honesty and fairness in dealing with stay petitions. As a result, the Department was permitted to recover the entire outstanding demand at its discretion, and the appeal lost its priority status, returning to the regular hearing schedule. The Tribunal's decision was communicated to tax authorities for necessary action and record-keeping.

---

---

Issues:
Violation of directions on tax liability payment and security furnishing.

Analysis:
The Tribunal initially allowed the assessee to pay outstanding tax liability in six equal instalments, with specific due dates for each instalment. The Tribunal also directed the assessee to provide security to the satisfaction of the Department within a specified timeframe. However, the Department informed the Tribunal that the assessee had defaulted on multiple grounds. The default included late payment of instalments, non-payment of subsequent instalments, and failure to furnish the required security despite reminders.

The Tribunal highlighted the significance of adhering to its orders, emphasizing the need for timely compliance to ensure justice and revenue collection efficiency. The Tribunal expressed dissatisfaction with the assessee's lack of respect for the directions provided in the stay petition order. The Tribunal noted the vigilance of the Department in monitoring compliance and promptly reporting violations to the Tribunal.

The Tribunal addressed an incident where the assessee's counsel attempted to influence the payment of instalments based on a procedural issue related to the adjournment of the appeal hearing. The Tribunal criticized this attempt to circumvent its order, labeling it as dishonest and lacking merit. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of fairness and honesty in dealing with stay petitions and compliance with tribunal orders.

Ultimately, the Tribunal decided to vacate the stay order granted to the assessee, allowing the Department to recover the entire outstanding demand as per its discretion. The priority status accorded to the appeal was withdrawn, returning it to its original place in the pendency list for scheduled hearings. The decision to reject the stay petition was communicated to relevant tax authorities for further action and record-keeping purposes.

---