TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the ex gratia amount of Rs. 1 lakh paid to the specified family members of the deceased was includible in the dutiable estate; (ii) whether the value of the old Vespa scooter should be taken at Rs. 2,500 or Rs. 1,000; and (iii) whether deduction under section 33(1)(h) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 was allowable.
Issue (i): whether the ex gratia amount of Rs. 1 lakh paid to the specified family members of the deceased was includible in the dutiable estate.
Analysis: The payment was sanctioned as an ex gratia grant, that is, a discretionary payment made as a matter of grace and not under any legal compulsion. It was payable only to the specified members of the family surviving the deceased. On that footing, the deceased had no beneficial interest in the amount during his lifetime and no property capable of being disposed of by him so as to attract estate duty under the statutory concept of property passing on death.
Conclusion: The amount of Rs. 1 lakh was not includible in the dutiable estate and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): whether the value of the old Vespa scooter should be taken at Rs. 2,500 or Rs. 1,000.
Analysis: The enhancement to Rs. 2,500 was made on a general observation about the scarcity of Vespa scooters, without adequate consideration of the actual condition of the scooter or the surrounding circumstances. The valuation shown by the accountable person was found more appropriate in the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The value of the scooter was directed to be taken at Rs. 1,000 and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (iii): whether deduction under section 33(1)(h) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 was allowable.
Analysis: The record indicated that the deduction had already been allowed. If it had not been given effect to, the authority was directed to allow it.
Conclusion: The deduction was held to be allowable and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The taxable estate was reduced by excluding the ex gratia payment and by accepting the lower valuation of the scooter, with the statutory deduction also to be given effect to.
Ratio Decidendi: A discretionary ex gratia payment payable only after death to specified family members, in which the deceased had no beneficial interest or power of disposal during life, is not property passing on death and is not includible in the dutiable estate.
TaxTMI 
