TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court rules interest tax based on actual receipt, assessee wins appeal</h1> <h3>Kerala State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax</h3> The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the High Court's decision. The Court emphasized that chargeable interest should be ... Whether on account of doctrine of incorporation, section 145, having been incorporated in section 21 of the Interest-tax Act, 1974, when the assessee maintains books of account on cash system and being assessed under the cash system does not the chargeable interest deserve to be computed on cash method Issues:Interpretation of section 5 of the Interest-tax Act, 1974 regarding chargeable interest calculation based on accounting method.Analysis:The High Court was asked to decide whether the Assessing Officer correctly computed interest on accrual basis instead of cash system, considering the incorporation of section 145 of the Income-tax Act into section 21 of the Interest-tax Act. The High Court ruled against the assessee, emphasizing that chargeable interest is the total interest accruing in the relevant year, not the amount received. However, the Supreme Court noted that section 5 of the Act is subject to its provisions and includes section 21, incorporating section 145 of the Income-tax Act. This section allows income computation based on cash or mercantile accounting. The assessee followed the cash system, leading to the argument that chargeable interest should be based on interest actually received.The Supreme Court highlighted the importance of the Finance Minister's Budget Speech, stating that the new tax would be levied on the gross amount of interest received by financial institutions. Referring to the case law of K.P. Varghese v. ITO, the Court acknowledged the relevance of the Minister's speech in interpreting legislative provisions. The Court concluded that the provisions of the Act were amended to include credit institutions and section 145 of the Income-tax Act, supporting the assessee's argument for calculating chargeable interest based on actual interest received. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and ruled in favor of the assessee against the Revenue. No costs were awarded in this matter.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
