Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal could, in exercise of its inherent powers, stay the Income-tax Officer from acting upon the Commissioner's direction under section 263 to withdraw investment allowance and recompute the income, pending disposal of the assessee's appeal.
Analysis: The Commissioner had directed withdrawal of the investment allowance already granted in the original assessment, leaving the Income-tax Officer with only the consequential step of revising the demand. In view of the pending appeal and to prevent consequential prejudice to the assessee, the Tribunal exercised its inherent powers and stayed further proceedings for a limited period. The Tribunal also required the assessee to furnish suitable security to safeguard any additional amount that might become leviable if the withdrawal of the investment allowance ultimately stood.
Conclusion: The Tribunal granted a limited stay of the proceedings and the assessee's request succeeded to that extent, subject to furnishing security.