Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the deceased's share in the investment allowance reserve of a partnership firm was includible in the principal value of the estate in full, and if includible, whether it had to be valued at a discounted figure having regard to the statutory restrictions under the Income-tax Act.
Analysis: The estate duty charge under sections 5 and 6 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 applies to property passing on death or property within the deceased's disposing capacity. The investment allowance reserve was subject to the limitations created by section 32A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the related consequence under section 155(4A), so the deceased's interest could not be treated as an unrestricted, full-value asset. At the same time, the deceased did possess a real right in the reserve, though that right was circumscribed by statutory conditions, the time period remaining before utilisation, and the surrounding facts affecting valuation.
Conclusion: The inclusion of the deceased's share in the investment allowance reserve was upheld in principle, but not at its full face value; the addition was directed to be restricted to a discounted amount, resulting in only a partial relief to the assessee.