Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the technical know-how fees received by the assessee in respect of deputed engineers were taxable in India, and whether the matter required fresh examination on the question whether the personnel remained employees of the assessee or became employees of the Indian company.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the true character of the arrangement under the design and construction supervision agreement. The earlier view had proceeded on the footing that the deputed engineers remained the assessee's personnel and that the services were rendered in India, while the assessee relied on the principle that technical information furnished from outside India does not, by itself, create taxable accrual in India. The Tribunal noted that the decisive factual question was whether the deputed technicians continued to be employees of the assessee or had been independently employed by the Indian company, because that fact could materially affect the application of the governing principles on accrual, deemed accrual, and business connection.
Conclusion: The taxability of the amount was not finally determined and the matter was sent back for fresh decision after determining the true employment status and related facts.