Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rectification made under section 154 of the Income-tax Act was valid when the alleged error was said to arise only from facts and material not shown to have existed on the assessment record and when the allowability of arrear rent was otherwise debatable.
Analysis: Rectification under section 154 is confined to mistakes that are apparent from the existing record. A fresh inquiry or later discovery of facts cannot be used to create a rectifiable error. The order of rectification did not disclose the material on record at the time of the original assessment or explain how the alleged mistake was self-evident from that record. The appellate material relied upon to sustain the rectification was not shown to have formed part of the assessment record. On merits also, the Revenue failed to establish that the liability to pay arrear rent had unquestionably not accrued during the relevant previous year on the basis of the record before the assessing officer.
Conclusion: The rectification was invalid and the issue is decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The orders of the authorities below were quashed and the original allowance of the arrear rent was restored.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 154 can be invoked only for an obvious error already discernible from the existing assessment record, and it cannot be used to sustain a rectification based on fresh investigation, subsequently discovered facts, or a debatable issue.