Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of the car benefit provided by the company could be included in the managing agent's individual assessment under section 2(6C)(iii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, when he did not have substantial interest in the company.
Analysis: The relevant charging definition applied only where the recipient of the benefit or perquisite had substantial interest in the company. On the facts found, the assessee did not hold such substantial interest and was not shown to be a relative of a person who did. In that situation, the statutory condition for invoking the provision was absent, and it was unnecessary to examine whether an unauthorised benefit otherwise fell within the clause.
Conclusion: The addition in the assessee's individual assessment was not sustainable, as the statutory requirement of substantial interest was not satisfied.