1981 (1) TMI 124 - AT - Wealth-tax

ITAT upholds AAC decision canceling reassessment orders for individual's net wealth

WEALTH TAX OFFICER. Versus SRI RAM SARAN KEJRIWAL.

The Appellate Tribunal ITAT CALCUTTA-B dismissed the Revenue's appeals against the AAC's decision to cancel reassessment orders for an individual's net ... - Issues:1. Reopening of assessments under s. 17(1)(a) of the Act.2. Validity of reassessment orders.3. Disclosure of material facts by the assessee.4. Alleged failure to disclose all particulars of wealth.5. Proper determination of property value.6. Dispute over rise in land and building prices.7. Decision on the appeals by the Revenue.Analysis:The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT CALCUTTA-B involved appeals by the Revenue against the AAC's order related to the reassessment of an individual's net wealth for the years 1965-66 and 1966-67. The original assessments were reopened under s. 17(1)(a) of the Act due to alleged non-disclosure of material facts by the assessee. The WTO determined higher net wealth figures in the reassessments, leading to the appeals before the AAC of Wealth-tax.The AAC canceled the reassessment orders, stating that the assessee had already disclosed all relevant details to the WTO in the original returns. The AAC found no omission or failure on the part of the assessee in disclosing the property details and valuation. The AAC's decision was influenced by a similar ruling by the Hon'ble Tribunal, Allahabad, in a different case. The AAC held that the reopening of assessments was not proper and, therefore, the reassessments were deemed bad in law.During the appeal hearing, the Deptl. Rep. argued that the reassessments were valid as the rise in property prices had not been considered in the original returns, indicating an omission in disclosing all particulars of wealth. In contrast, the assessee's counsel supported the AAC's decision, emphasizing that all necessary details were disclosed initially.The Tribunal examined the arguments and facts, concluding that the assessee had indeed disclosed all material facts fully and truly in the original returns. The Tribunal noted that the subsequent valuation and sales could not have been predicted at the time of filing the returns. It was the responsibility of the WTO to conduct an inquiry based on the disclosed facts to determine the correct property value. The Tribunal agreed with the AAC that there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts, and the reopening of assessments lacked proper grounds.Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals by the Revenue, upholding the AAC's decision to cancel the reassessment orders. The judgment emphasized the importance of full and true disclosure of material facts by the assessee and highlighted the WTO's role in determining accurate property values based on the information provided.