TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules share income belongs to all partners, investments sourced from partnership funds</h1> <h3>BHAGWAN DASS. Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER.</h3> The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, determining that the share income from M/s. Modern Construction Co. should be considered the profit of ... - Issues:1. Whether the share income of the assessee from M/s. Modern Construction Co. should be assessed as his individual income or as income of the partners of M/s. Sangathan Weekly.2. Whether the investment made by the assessee in M/s. Modern Construction Co. came from the funds of M/s. Sangathan Weekly.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1:The assessee contended that the share income from M/s. Modern Construction Co. belonged to the partners of M/s. Sangathan Weekly and not solely to him. The WTO added the entire share income of the assessee in M/s. Modern Construction Co. to his total income. The AAC upheld this view, stating that the income earned by the assessee from M/s. Modern Construction Co. was his personal income. The counsel for the assessee argued that the profits should be assessed as the profits of all partners of M/s. Sangathan Weekly. The Tribunal examined the partnership deeds and agreements, concluding that the income earned by the assessee in M/s. Modern Construction Co. was the profit of all partners of M/s. Sangathan Weekly. The Tribunal deleted the addition made to the total income of the assessee.Issue 2:The counsel for the assessee argued that the investment in M/s. Modern Construction Co. came from the funds of M/s. Sangathan Weekly. The Tribunal analyzed the agreements and found that the capital provided by the assessee as a partner of M/s. Modern Construction Co. was indeed from the firm M/s. Sangathan Weekly. The Tribunal held that the investment made by the assessee in M/s. Modern Construction Co. was in accordance with the agreements and shared among all partners of M/s. Sangathan Weekly. Therefore, the addition to the total income of the assessee was deleted.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, holding that the income earned from M/s. Modern Construction Co. should be treated as the profit of all partners of M/s. Sangathan Weekly and that the investment made by the assessee in the firm came from the funds of M/s. Sangathan Weekly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
