Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80-I for the assessment years in question, and whether the undertaking was a new industrial undertaking beginning manufacture in the later year or merely an expansion or relocation of the existing unit with use of previously used machinery exceeding the permissible limit.
Analysis: The assessee had applied for and obtained industrial licence for manufacture of the relevant chemical products before the claimed new start, and the evidence in the annual accounts showed that business operations had already commenced in the earlier assessment year. The relocation from one site to another did not create a fresh industrial undertaking, and the addition of further products was treated as an extension of the same undertaking. On the facts found, the machinery previously used formed more than 20 per cent of the total value of machinery used in the initial year, so the condition in the provision and its Explanation was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to deduction under section 80-I, and the Revenue's objection succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: For section 80-I, a mere shifting of location or addition of allied products does not constitute a new industrial undertaking where commercial production had already begun earlier and the value of previously used machinery exceeds the statutory ceiling.