Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee had sufficient and reasonable cause for non-compliance with the notice issued under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the petition under section 146 for reopening the ex parte assessment under section 144 was wrongly rejected.
Analysis: The assessee's case was that non-compliance occurred because he was ill and unable to attend the hearing. That explanation remained unrebutted by the lower authorities. The rejection of the petition proceeded on the footing that the assessee was represented by authorised representatives and could have arranged production of documents through them. The illness of the assessee and the practical inability to contact representatives were not properly appreciated, and the rejection of the section 146 petition was found to be unsustainable on the facts and circumstances.
Conclusion: The non-compliance was for sufficient and reasonable cause, and the petition under section 146 ought to have been accepted. The assessee succeeded and the ex parte assessment under section 144 was treated as reopened.