Treaty-based taxation of consultancy services: Indian-source character prevailed despite some overseas preparatory work.

Treaty provisions under the Indo-Austrian DTAA prevailed over the Act to the extent they were more beneficial under section 90(2). On the facts, consultancy services were treated as rendered in India because the consultant visited the Indian factory, examined machinery, and advised on remedial measures; background work done abroad did not change that character. The payment was therefore taxable in India under Article XIV, so denial of tax deduction at source on the footing of non-taxability was not justified. The record, however, did not establish whether the remuneration was subject to Austrian tax, and that factual condition required verification for complete exemption under Article XIV(2).

---

---

Issues: Whether the payment made to the Austrian consultant was taxable in India under the applicable Indo-Austrian Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement and, consequently, whether tax was deductible at source under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The treaty provisions prevailed over the Act to the extent they were more beneficial to the assessee under section 90(2). On the facts, the consultant had visited the Indian factory, examined the machinery there, and advised on remedial measures; the fact that some study or writing work was done abroad did not alter the character of the services as rendered in India. The payment was therefore liable to tax in India under Article XIV of the DTAA, rather than being excluded merely because some background work occurred outside India. However, the record did not establish whether the remuneration was subject to Austrian tax, which was a necessary condition for complete exemption under Article XIV(2).

Conclusion: The payment was held taxable in India, so tax deduction at source could not be denied on that basis; nevertheless, the matter was remitted to verify whether the Austrian tax condition was satisfied.

---