Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether inland haulage charges received by a non-resident shipping enterprise for transport of cargo from an inland place to the port, as part of a combined through-transport arrangement, fall within the exemption for income from the operation of ships in international traffic under Article 8 of the Indo-Belgium DTAA and therefore are not taxable in India.
Analysis: Section 44B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was considered for the limited purpose of computing shipping income, but the decisive question was the scope of Article 8 of the treaty. The expression "any other activity directly connected with such transportation" in Article 8(2)(b)(ii) was construed broadly in the context of the full transport arrangement. The inland haulage was found to be part of a single composite movement from the place of origin to the foreign destination, supported by through bills of lading and the fact that the same enterprise undertook both the inland movement and the ocean carriage. The treaty language was also read with Article 8(2)(c), which extends to income from the use of containers and related equipment in connection with international traffic. On that reading, the inland haulage receipts were not treated as a separate inland business divorced from shipping operations.
Conclusion: The inland haulage charges were held to fall within Article 8 of the Indo-Belgium DTAA and were not liable to tax in India.