Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2003 (12) TMI 267 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Unexplained hundies and bank deposits: addition deleted on one ground, remanded for fresh inquiry on linked cash deposits. Signed hundies found in the assessee's possession did not, by themselves, establish unexplained investment where surrounding circumstances and the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Unexplained hundies and bank deposits: addition deleted on one ground, remanded for fresh inquiry on linked cash deposits.

                          Signed hundies found in the assessee's possession did not, by themselves, establish unexplained investment where surrounding circumstances and the signer's statement showed no money had been advanced against them, so the addition was deleted. The linked issue of cash deposits in the related bank account still required fresh examination because uncontroverted material indicated that the deposits came from the assessee, and the matter was remanded for determination within appellate limits. Disallowance of salaries was sustained for want of evidence, while bank interest remained subject to verification. The reduced estimate of commission income from cheque discounting was upheld, but the addition connected with accommodation entries in the bank account was restored in principle as routed transactions warranted taxation.




                          Issues: (i) Whether the addition of Rs. 23 lakhs as unexplained investment in the hundies was sustainable, and whether the alternative plea regarding unexplained cash deposits in the bank account required remand; (ii) Whether the disallowance of bank interest and salaries was justified; (iii) Whether the estimate of commission income from cheque discounting and the deletion of the addition relating to accommodation entries in the Dena Bank account called for interference.

                          Issue (i): Whether the addition of Rs. 23 lakhs as unexplained investment in the hundies was sustainable, and whether the alternative plea regarding unexplained cash deposits in the bank account required remand

                          Analysis: The signed hundies were found in the assessee's possession, but the statement of the person who had signed them explained that no money had been received against them and that they were retained as a safeguard against misuse of the bank account. The surrounding circumstances supported the explanation that the hundies were not evidence of advances by the assessee. At the same time, the uncontroverted statement that cash deposits in the linked bank account came from the assessee could not be ignored. The matter therefore required examination of whether any unexplained cash deposits were taxable, and the quantum had to be determined without resulting in enhancement beyond the existing addition.

                          Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 23 lakhs was deleted, but the question of unexplained cash deposits was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration; the issue was thus partly in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the disallowance of bank interest and salaries was justified

                          Analysis: The appellate authority had already directed verification of the bank account for allowing interest if it had been debited there, so no further interference was warranted on that aspect. As regards salaries, the claim was unsupported by evidence.

                          Conclusion: The claim for bank interest remained subject to verification, and the disallowance of salaries was sustained.

                          Issue (iii): Whether the estimate of commission income from cheque discounting and the deletion of the addition relating to accommodation entries in the Dena Bank account called for interference

                          Analysis: On the cheque-discounting activity, the reduced estimate of commission made by the first appellate authority was not shown to be unreasonable on the material available. On the accommodation-entry issue, the bank account was found to have been used for routed transactions, and some income therefrom had to be brought to tax.

                          Conclusion: The estimate of commission income from cheque discounting was upheld, while the deletion of the addition relating to the bank account was reversed and the addition was restored in principle.

                          Final Conclusion: The cross-appeals were disposed of by sustaining some additions, deleting one major addition, and remanding the question of unexplained cash deposits for fresh adjudication, resulting in a partly favourable outcome for both sides.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Where a seized document and surrounding circumstances do not establish an advance by the assessee, the addition cannot stand on that basis alone, but an uncontroverted statement showing cash deposits from the assessee may justify separate inquiry into unexplained deposits, subject to the limits of appellate powers.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found