Depreciation on stock exchange membership card depends on ownership, business use and diminution in value; claim remanded for fresh review.

Depreciation on a Bombay Stock Exchange membership card was treated as dependent on the statutory requirements of section 32, including capability of diminution in value, ownership and use for business purposes. A membership card may be a capital asset, but that alone does not establish depreciation entitlement. Because the record did not show whether the card was capable of diminution in value or whether the assessee satisfied the ownership and business-use conditions under the stock exchange rules, the claim could not be finally accepted. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether depreciation was allowable on the Bombay Stock Exchange membership card under section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether the matter required reconsideration on the questions of diminution in value, ownership and business use of the card.

Issue (i): Whether depreciation was allowable on the Bombay Stock Exchange membership card under section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: Depreciation under section 32 is admissible only where the asset is capable of diminishing in value because of wear and tear, obsolescence or other recognised factors of depreciation, and the asset must also satisfy the statutory requirements of ownership and use for the purposes of business. A stock exchange membership card may be a capital asset, but that by itself does not establish entitlement to depreciation unless these statutory conditions are fulfilled.

Conclusion: The claim for depreciation could not be finally allowed on the existing record and required fresh examination.

Issue (ii): Whether the matter required reconsideration on the questions of diminution in value, ownership and business use of the card.

Analysis: The departmental authorities had not examined whether the card was capable of diminution in value or whether the assessee could be regarded as its owner under the stock exchange rules. Those factual and legal aspects were material to the claim and had to be determined afresh after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.

Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision on these issues.

Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained only a limited and remand-based relief, with the depreciation claim left to be decided afresh by the Assessing Officer.

Ratio Decidendi: Depreciation on a claimed capital asset is allowable only if the asset is shown to be capable of diminution in value and the assessee satisfies the statutory requirements of ownership and business use.

---