DTAA shipping profits and no permanent establishment kept foreign freight outside Indian tax and TDS liability.

Freight paid to a Singapore shipping enterprise for carriage connected with Indian ports was treated as not chargeable to tax in India because the DTAA prevailed over the general charging and TDS provisions of the Income-tax Act. The voyage was regarded as an international voyage, with only a temporary deviation to Indian ports, so the shipping article governing profits from ships in international traffic applied and the income remained taxable only in Singapore. The enterprise also had no fixed place of business or other permanent establishment in India, and the residuary treaty article did not apply because the receipt was covered by specific treaty provisions. As a result, no obligation to deduct tax at source arose and the assessee-in-default demands were unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether freight paid to a Singapore shipping enterprise for carriage between Indian ports was chargeable to tax in India so as to attract deduction of tax at source under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961; and whether the non-resident had a permanent establishment in India or the payment fell within the residuary article of the India-Singapore DTAA.

Analysis: The payment was examined first under the treaty, since the DTAA overrides the general charging and collection provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 where applicable. The ship was found to be on an international voyage from Singapore to the Arabian Gulf and had merely deviated to Indian ports for a short period to perform the chartered transport; it was not operated solely between places in India. On that basis, the freight was held to fall within the shipping article dealing with profits from ships in international traffic, and such profits were taxable only in Singapore. In any event, the income was treated as business profit, and the non-resident had no fixed place of business or other permanent establishment in India under the treaty. The residuary article was held inapplicable because the receipt was not an item of income outside the specific treaty articles.

Conclusion: The freight was not chargeable to tax in India and the assessee had no obligation to deduct tax at source under section 195. The orders treating the assessee as an assessee in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) were unsustainable.

Final Conclusion: The treaty provisions governing international shipping and business profits prevailed, the non-resident's receipt remained taxable only in Singapore, and the source deduction demand in India could not be maintained.

Ratio Decidendi: A foreign shipping enterprise's freight is not taxable in India, and no tax is deductible at source, where the voyage is not operated solely between Indian ports, the enterprise has no permanent establishment in India, and the receipt falls within the treaty's shipping or business profits provisions rather than its residuary article.

---