Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rectification under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be invoked to grant relief under section 84 of the Act when the assessment record did not contain sufficient material to establish the statutory conditions for that relief.
Analysis: Section 154 permits amendment only to rectify a mistake apparent from the record. Relief under section 84 depended on satisfaction of several factual conditions, and the Income-tax Officer could grant such relief only if the assessment record contained clear data enabling those conditions to be examined. The Court accepted that material from the super profits tax record could, to the extent relevant, form part of the income-tax record. However, the material shown did not establish that all facts necessary to satisfy section 84 were available on the record when the assessment was completed. In the absence of such material, omission to grant the relief could not be treated as a mistake apparent from the record.
Conclusion: Rectification under section 154 could not be used to grant section 84 relief on the facts, and the assessee's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Rectification is available only where the record itself contains sufficient material to show an apparent mistake; a statutory relief requiring proof of multiple factual conditions cannot be allowed under section 154 unless those conditions are demonstrable from the existing record.