Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court upholds interest levy under Income-tax Act, clarifies appeal vs. revision jurisdiction

        Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax

        Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co. Limited Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax - [1986] 160 ITR 961 (SC) Issues Involved:
        1. Levy of interest under Section 139(8) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
        2. Levy of interest under Section 215 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
        3. Appealability of orders levying interest under Sections 139(8) and 215.
        4. Revisional jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 264.

        Detailed Analysis:

        1. Levy of Interest under Section 139(8):
        The appellant was assessed to income-tax for the assessment year 1967-68, and interest under sub-section (8) of section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, amounting to Rs. 56,391 was levied for delay in furnishing the return. The appellant contended that there was ample and clear justification for the delay. The statute requires the levy of interest where the assessee fails to furnish an income-tax return within the prescribed period or does not furnish it at all. The second proviso to sub-section (8) empowers the Income-tax Officer to reduce or waive the interest payable in prescribed cases and circumstances, as detailed in Rule 117A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.

        2. Levy of Interest under Section 215:
        Interest amounting to Rs. 9,42,336, subsequently reduced to Rs. 5,07,880, was levied under section 215 for underestimating the advance tax. The relevant sub-sections of section 215 stipulate that where an assessee has paid advance tax under section 212 on the basis of his own estimate, and the advance tax so paid is less than seventy-five percent of the tax determined on the basis of the regular assessment, simple interest at nine percent per annum is payable on the shortfall. Rule 40 of the Income-tax Rules details the circumstances under which the interest payable under section 215 may be reduced or waived.

        3. Appealability of Orders Levying Interest:
        The appellant initially raised objections to the interest charged under sections 139 and 215 before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner but was advised that such grounds were infructuous as orders under these sections were not appealable. Clause (c) of section 246 provides for an appeal against an order where the assessee denies his liability to be assessed under the Act or objects to the amount of income assessed or tax determined. The court held that although the levy of interest is part of the process of assessment, it is not correct to refer to it as a penalty. Interest is levied by way of compensation for the Revenue being deprived of tax for the period it remained unpaid. The court endorsed the view that the question of waiver or reduction of interest cannot be the subject of an appeal under clause (c) of section 246, which is more appropriately dealt with by the Commissioner of Income-tax in revisional jurisdiction.

        4. Revisional Jurisdiction of the Commissioner under Section 264:
        The appellant filed revision petitions before the Commissioner of Income-tax objecting to the levy of interest under sections 139 and 215. However, the Commissioner dismissed both petitions, stating that the appellant should have withdrawn the entire appeal pending before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, not just the grounds relating to the levy of interest. The court noted that before invoking the revisional jurisdiction, the assessee must demonstrate before the Income-tax Officer that there is a case for waiving or reducing the levy of interest. The court found no record of such an attempt by the assessee. The court affirmed the orders of the Commissioner rejecting the revision petitions but allowed the appellant to apply to the Income-tax Officer for waiver or reduction of interest within six weeks, directing the Income-tax Officer to dispose of the applications on merits expeditiously.

        Conclusion:
        The appeals were dismissed, affirming the orders of the Commissioner of Income-tax on different grounds. The court left it open for the assessee to apply for waiver or reduction of interest under sections 139(8) and 215, with no order as to costs.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found