Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the insurance premia paid under a policy governed by the Married Women's Property Act could be treated as a gift to the wife within the meaning of section 9(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, and brought to estate duty, or whether the amount was outside section 9(1) and relevant only for section 34(3).
Analysis: Section 9(1) was read as referring to an immediate gift inter vivos. On that construction, premium payments made to the insurer could not be characterised as a gift to the wife merely because the policy was for her benefit. The view was supported by the earlier tribunal decision relied upon by the assessee, and the reasoning that such premium payments did not amount to a disposition in favour of the beneficiary within the meaning of section 9(1).
Conclusion: The premium payments were not a gift within section 9(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, and the addition was rightly deleted.