Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Assessing Officer could validly assume jurisdiction to assess the donee under section 21A of the Gift-tax Act in the absence of a finding that the donor could not be found after due and reasonable diligence.
Analysis: Gift-tax is chargeable on gifts made by the donor, and section 21A applies only when the Assessing Officer, after using all due and reasonable diligence, cannot find the donor for the purposes of service of notice under section 13(2) or section 16. The statutory precondition is jurisdictional and must be satisfied by the Assessing Officer before proceeding against the donee. On the facts, the Assessing Officer had not shown any proper effort to trace the donor and had not established that the donor could not be found. The attempt to proceed against the assessee was therefore not supported by the mandatory statutory conditions.
Conclusion: The assessment on the donee was not validly assumed under section 21A of the Gift-tax Act and the cancellation of the assessment was upheld in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Proceedings against a donee under section 21A of the Gift-tax Act are permissible only when the Assessing Officer has, after due and reasonable diligence, been unable to find the donor; absent that jurisdictional condition, the assessment on the donee is invalid.