Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deposits standing in Non-resident (External) Accounts were exempt under section 6 of the Wealth-tax Act for the relevant assessment years, and whether the benefit of Explanation IA applied only from 1-4-1982 or also clarified the pre-existing position.
Analysis: Section 6 excludes specified assets from net wealth in the case of a non-resident or other qualifying assessee. The deposits in the Non-resident (External) Accounts were treated as debts representing assets in India. Explanation IA, inserted with effect from 1-4-1982, enlarged the class of non-residents for that specific asset category by linking the expression to section 2(q) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, but it did not create the basic character of such deposits as debts for section 6(ii). For years prior to that amendment, entitlement depended on whether the assessee satisfied the definition of non-resident under the Income-tax Act. On the facts found in the income-tax proceedings, the assessee was shown to be non-resident for some years, while the status for the intermediate years required re-examination.
Conclusion: The exemption was available where the assessee was non-resident under the Income-tax Act in the relevant year, so the assessee succeeded for the years where that status stood established, and the matter for the remaining years was remitted for verification of residential status.