Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act was available in respect of office premises used for commercial purposes, and whether the departmental authorities were bound by the CBDT circular clarifying the scope of the exemption.
Analysis: The assessee claimed exemption for office premises in Dalamal Chambers under section 5(1)(iv). The appellate authority relied on CBDT Circular No. 317/23/73-WT dated 24 July 1973, which clarified that the exemption was available even where the house was used for commercial purposes. The Tribunal noted that the circular was binding on the departmental authorities and that the WTO had overlooked it.
Conclusion: The exemption was available to the assessee for the office premises, and the appellate authority's direction to exclude its value from the wealth computation was ; the Revenue's challenge failed.