Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 was available in respect of office premises used for commercial purposes, and whether the CBDT circular on the point was binding on the departmental authorities.
Analysis: The assessee claimed exemption for office premises included in his wealth-tax assessment. The Wealth-tax Officer disallowed the claim on the view that the exemption was confined to a house or part of a house and not to office premises. The Appellate Tribunal noted that the relevant CBDT circular clarified that the exemption under section 5(1)(iv) was available even where the house was used for commercial purposes, and that such circular was binding on the departmental authorities.
Conclusion: The exemption was rightly allowed, the circular was binding, and the Revenue's challenge failed.