1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tax penalty appeal reduced from Rs. 15,000 to Rs. 1,500. Tribunal dismisses departmental appeal.</h1> The Department's appeal against a penalty of Rs. 15,000 under s. 271(1)(c) was reduced to Rs. 1,500 by the AAC. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the AAC's ... - The Department appealed against a penalty of Rs. 15,000 under s. 271(1)(c), which was reduced to Rs. 1,500 by the AAC. The penalty was related to alleged bogus loans and suppressed sale of stock-in-trade. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the AAC's decision, stating that penalties for loans taken on the opening day of business were not justified, and the suppression of sales was not proven. The penalty was vacated, and the departmental appeal was dismissed. The assessee's cross objection was allowed. (Case: Appellate Tribunal ITAT BOMBAY-B, Citation: 1981 (2) TMI 105 - ITAT BOMBAY-B)
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
