Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the interest arising on fixed deposits under a reinvestment plan was assessable as capital gains or as revenue income, and whether only the interest that accrued in the relevant previous year could be brought to tax.
Analysis: The fixed deposit receipts showed that interest accrued annually and was reinvested at the assessee's instance, so the receipts could not be treated as capital gains. Once the interest was characterised as revenue receipt, the scheme of sections 4 and 5 of the Income-tax Act required taxation of income on accrual, unless the assessee was permitted to be assessed on receipt basis. The assessee was entitled to the benefit of the CBDT circulars recognising such option, and the Supreme Court decision in CIT v. T. N. K. Govindarajulu Chetty supported assessment only of income accrued in the relevant year.
Conclusion: The interest was not capital gains. The assessee succeeded on the alternative plea, and only the interest accrued during the previous year relevant to the assessment year was liable to be assessed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where fixed deposit interest accrues annually under the terms of the deposit, it is taxable as revenue income on accrual, and only the income accrued in the relevant previous year can be assessed for that year, subject to the assessee's permissible option under the tax administration circulars.