1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>ITAT modifies disallowances under sections 37(2A) & 37(4), excludes entertainment expenses, re-examination ordered</h1> The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, modifying the disallowances under sections 37(2A) and 37(4). It directed the assessing officer to exclude a portion of ... - Issues:1. Disallowance of entertainment expenditure incurred on serving coffee, tea, etc. to customers visiting sales offices.2. Disallowance under section 37(4) of the Act for maintenance of guest house.Analysis:*Issue 1: Disallowance of Entertainment Expenditure*The appeal was filed against the CIT(A)'s order regarding the disallowance of Rs. 64,904 incurred by the assessee in serving coffee, tea, etc. to customers visiting sales offices. The ITO treated this amount as part of entertainment expenditure under section 37(2A) of the Act. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance citing the insertion of Explanation 2 below section 37(2A). However, the ITAT directed the ITO to exclude 1/4th of the expenditure from the provisions of section 37(2A) as it included expenses on food or beverages provided to employees, thus modifying the CIT(A)'s order.*Issue 2: Disallowance under Section 37(4) for Maintenance of Guest House*Regarding the disallowance under section 37(4) for maintenance of a guest house, the ITO rejected the claim stating that the accommodations were made available to outsiders as well. The CIT(A) rejected the contentions of the assessee, including the argument that the expenditure on running the guest house should not be included. The ITAT considered various decisions cited by the assessee's counsel, emphasizing that the provisions of section 37(5) are wide enough to cover any accommodation maintained by the assessee for providing lodging or boarding. The ITAT held that after the insertion of section 37(5), there is no scope for excluding any accommodation from the application of section 37(4). The ITAT also addressed the non-applicability of running expenses for the guest house and the claim regarding items allowable under sections 30 to 36, setting aside the matter for re-examination by the assessing officer.In conclusion, the ITAT partly allowed the appeal, modifying the disallowances under sections 37(2A) and 37(4) while providing directions for re-computation by the assessing officer based on the legal interpretations and precedents discussed during the proceedings.