Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether battery charging by adding electrolyte and passing electric current through the battery supplied by the manufacturer constituted "manufacture" within the meaning of section 2(17) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Analysis: The statutory definition of manufacture covers producing, making, extracting, altering, ornamenting, finishing, or otherwise processing, treating or adapting goods, but the controlling test applied was whether the activity brought into existence a commercially different commodity. The record showed that the batteries had already undergone the manufacturer's formation charge and were received in a dry condition only for convenience of transport. The dealer's initial charge merely restored and completed the battery's working condition by filling electrolyte and passing current for a further period, without altering the essential nature or character of the article. The authorities distinguished earlier precedent treating charged batteries as manufactured goods because the present facts showed no emergence of a new commercial commodity.
Conclusion: The activity did not amount to manufacture, and the answer to the referred question was in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.