Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tax Appeals for Brick Manufacturing Firms Upheld on Lack of Concrete Evidence</h1> The appeals for assessment years 1991-92 and 1992-93 involving two sister concerns in the brick manufacturing industry were partly accepted. The Tribunal ... - Issues involved: The judgment deals with appeals related to common questions of law and facts for assessment years 1991-92 and 1992-93 involving two sister concerns engaged in the manufacture and sale of bricks.Assessment Year 1991-92:- The appellant argued that no incriminating documents were seized for this year, and the estimation of production was based on a document relevant for the next year.- The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, stating that evidence for the next year cannot be used to estimate income for the current year.- The Department's estimation of unaccounted production for the entire year was deemed arbitrary and devoid of merit, as uniform production cannot be assumed in this business.- The Department's innovation regarding transportation and unaccounted investment lacked evidence and was not supported, leading to acceptance of the appellant's plea.Assessment Year 1992-93:- Similar issues as in 1991-92 were raised and decided in favor of the appellants, highlighting the unreasonable estimations by the Department without proper evidence.- The Tribunal emphasized the need for fair consideration of all facts and absence of prejudice in reaching conclusions, rejecting the Department's approach as untenable in law.Conclusion:- The appeals were partly accepted, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellants due to lack of concrete evidence supporting the Department's estimations and innovations, emphasizing the need for a fair and evidence-based approach in tax assessments.