Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the additions relating to alleged NRI gifts and allied estimates could be sustained in the regular assessment under section 143(3) or were liable to be considered only in the block assessment under section 158BC, and whether the block assessment could again tax the same income.
Analysis: The assessment year in question had already been subjected to a regular assessment on the basis of material available with the Assessing Officer, and the same amount was also brought to tax in the block assessment after the search. The Tribunal held that where the identity of the assessee and the relevant assessment year are not in doubt, the same income cannot be assessed twice merely by labelling one assessment as protective and the other as substantive. It further held that, for the same reason, estimates of commission and excess agricultural income in the block assessment were unsupported by seized material and could not survive as undisclosed income within the meaning of the block assessment provisions.
Conclusion: The addition in the regular assessment was upheld and the contrary view of the first appellate authority was reversed, while the block assessment additions were deleted as resulting in double taxation and lacking support from seized material.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the same income for the same assessee and assessment year has already been brought to tax on the basis of material available at the time of regular assessment, it cannot again be assessed in block proceedings in the absence of fresh seized material establishing undisclosed income.