Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the firm could be assessed as an unregistered firm after its partners had already been assessed on their respective share income from the same firm.
Analysis: The partners were found to have been assessed on their share income before the assessment of the firm. The governing principle accepted by the Court was that once the Revenue has chosen to assess the partners on the firm's profits, it is precluded from assessing the firm again in the status of an unregistered firm. The Court also treated the departmental circulars as binding and followed the line of authorities holding that the Supreme Court's earlier ruling applied equally under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Conclusion: The assessment of the firm as an unregistered firm was invalid and could not be sustained.