Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the entire Hindu undivided family assets in the hands of a sole surviving coparcener were deemed to pass on his death under section 6 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953.
Analysis: The deceased was the sole male coparcener after his son separated from the family, leaving him and his wife. The Tribunal held that a sole surviving coparcener has full power to alienate the coparcenary property as if it were his separate property. On that footing, the entire property was within his competence to dispose of at the time of death, attracting section 6. The Tribunal followed its earlier view and the supporting High Court authority, and rejected the contrary Tribunal decisions relied on by the assessee.
Conclusion: The entire HUF assets were deemed to pass on the deceased's death under section 6, against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed because the deceased, being a sole surviving coparcener, was treated as competent to dispose of the whole coparcenary property and the entire estate was liable to estate duty.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a deceased was a sole surviving coparcener and had full power to dispose of the coparcenary property, the whole of that property is deemed to pass on death under section 6 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953.