Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an intended gift under the Gift-tax Act is complete when the donee has not accepted the gifted amount and later returns it to the donor.
Analysis: The definition of "gift" under section 2(xii) of the Gift-tax Act contemplates a transfer by one person to another of existing movable or immovable property made voluntarily and without consideration. Though the Gift-tax Act does not expressly repeat the requirement of acceptance, the concept of transfer in section 2(xxiv) and the general law of gifts under section 122 of the Transfer of Property Act show that a gift necessarily involves a completed transfer to a donee. On the facts, the intended donees were not aware of the gifts when the amounts were credited, and they later disclaimed and returned the money. The intended gifts therefore never attained completion.
Conclusion: The gifts were not complete without acceptance by the donees, and the revised returns declaring nil taxable gift were rightly accepted.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeals failed because the transactions did not mature into completed gifts chargeable to gift-tax.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the Gift-tax Act, a gift is not complete unless there is a completed transfer to and acceptance by the donee; an unaccepted and repudiated intended gift does not give rise to taxable gift liability.