Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 was leviable for late filing of wealth-tax returns, or whether the assessee had shown reasonable cause for the delay.
Analysis: The returns were filed belatedly, but the delay was examined in the light of the assessee's attainment of majority, his lack of familiarity with wealth-tax obligations, and the fact that the returned wealth was only marginally below the taxable threshold while the assessed wealth increased because of valuation appreciation. The explanation was not treated as a mere excuse of ignorance of law; rather, the surrounding circumstances were found sufficient to constitute reasonable cause for the delay.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 was not sustainable; the assessee succeeded and the penalties were cancelled.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the delay in filing a wealth-tax return is explained by bona fide circumstances showing reasonable cause, including marginal taxability and the assessee's recent attainment of majority, penalty for late filing is not exigible.