Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the monthly allowance received by a member of a Hindu undivided family from a partnership firm, under the terms of the partnership deed, constituted the income of the Hindu undivided family or the individual income of the recipient.
Analysis: The general rule is that remuneration received by a member of an HUF as partner of a firm in which the HUF is a partner is taxable as the member's individual income. On the facts here, however, the partnership deed showed that the monthly payment was not confined to personal services alone; it was also stipulated as consideration for goodwill and the business location, and the payment was to continue even after retirement. The contractual setting indicated that the receipt arose in the representative capacity of the karta of the smaller HUF rather than in a purely personal capacity.
Conclusion: The allowance was held to be income of the HUF and not the individual income of Motilal.
Final Conclusion: The additions made by the Income Tax Officer were restored and the assessee's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a payment under a partnership deed is referable not merely to personal services but also to the business goodwill or other family-related commercial consideration, the receipt may be assessable as HUF income notwithstanding the general rule applicable to remuneration earned by a coparcener as partner.