Supreme Court rules on leasehold expenditure for sugar factory as capital, dismisses appeals. The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 123 of 1989 regarding expenditure for acquiring a leasehold right for a sugar factory, deeming the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court rules on leasehold expenditure for sugar factory as capital, dismisses appeals.
The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 123 of 1989 regarding expenditure for acquiring a leasehold right for a sugar factory, deeming the expenditure as of a capital nature. Civil Appeal No. 20 of 1985 was also dismissed in connection with the first appeal. No costs were awarded in either case.
The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 123 of 1989, which involved expenditure for acquiring a leasehold right for a sugar factory, stating the expenditure is of a capital nature. Civil Appeal No. 20 of 1985 was also dismissed in view of the first appeal. No costs were awarded in both cases.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.