Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reopening of the assessments under section 147(a) and the addition of the wife's share income under section 64(1) were justified.
Analysis: The assessee had not disclosed the wife's income from her share in the profits of the firm in the returns, despite the specific requirement to do so under the return provisions. On the admitted facts, the reassessment notices under section 148 were validly issued and the income of the wife was rightly included in the assessee's hands. The reasoning was reinforced by the then-prevailing Allahabad High Court view relied upon in the reassessment proceedings and by the later Full Bench affirmation of that view.
Conclusion: The reopening of the assessments and the consequential additions were upheld.